Multi-Leveled: MARK TWAIN Constructed Response Practice & Word Work RI6.10
When you first step into a classroom designed for students with significant cognitive disabilities, the weight of the "grade-level" curriculum can feel daunting. You look at a standard like RI.6.10—reading and comprehending complex literary nonfiction—and then you look at your students, some of whom are still mastering foundational decoding. As a mentor, the most important thing I can tell you is this: our job isn't to change the destination; it’s to build a more accessible road.
In my experience, figures like Mark Twain are perfect for this journey. Twain’s life was one of movement, humor, and resilience—themes that resonate deeply with our students. However, handed a standard biography, a Tier 3 learner or a student navigating a new language might only see a wall of text. To get them to the "heart" of the man who gave us Tom Sawyer, we have to break that wall down into digestible, tiered layers.
The Architecture of the Tiered Text
One of the first things you’ll learn is that "one-size-fits-all" is a myth in special education. We recently worked through a
Level 1 learners might work with enlarged, highly simplified text with bolded keywords. Level 2 and 3 learners might engage with more complex syntax but still rely on word banks for vocabulary. When you walk around the room during Whole Group Instruction, you’ll see everyone participating in the same conversation about Twain’s life, but each student is accessing the information at a level that honors their cognitive strengths.
Scaffolding the Response with RACE
Reading the information is only half the battle. The real "productive struggle" begins when we ask them to write. For a student with an IEP, a prompt like "Explain Twain's impact on literature" can lead to immediate shutdown. They have the thought, but they lack the bucket to carry it in.
This is where the RACE strategy (Restate, Answer, Cite, Explain) becomes their compass. By using the
 |
| [Image: A classroom anchor chart showing the RACE acronym with visual icons for each step.] |
Observation as Mentoring
As you move through the "Practice" and "Partner Work" phases of our daily agenda, I want you to focus on the small, quiet victories. In our classroom, these victories are often found in the word work. You might see a student using a graphic organizer to sort Twain's vocabulary or another student using comprehension cards to check their own understanding.
These aren't just "fill-in-the-blank" moments; they are metacognitive milestones. When a student uses a word bank to successfully complete a guided note, they are practicing the "word attack" skills they’ll need in the workforce. Because this resource is low-prep and printer-friendly, you aren't stuck at a desk grading. You are on the floor, observing how a student uses the highlighted keywords to locate text evidence. This is where you collect the data that truly reflects their growth.
Why Structure Leads to Student Agency
New teachers often worry that being too structured will stifle a student's voice. In reality, for the neurodiverse learner, structure is what allows that voice to emerge. When the mechanical burden of "how do I write a paragraph?" is handled by the RACE strategy and scaffolded templates, the student’s actual ideas about Twain’s wit or his travels can finally come to the surface.
Whether it’s a 15-page packet for in-class work or a simplified version for homework, the goal remains the same: routine writing over various time frames. We are helping them build the stamina to develop a topic with relevant facts and concrete details—a skill that will serve them long after they leave our classroom.
A Reflective Note for the Week
As you mentor your students through their Mark Twain biographies this week, keep a close eye on the "Quick Check" assessments. They tell a story that goes beyond a grade. They show us how a student is navigating informational text and where the scaffolds are working best.
In my years of teaching, I’ve found that when we remove the "clutter" of complex formatting and replace it with clear, tiered access, the students stay engaged because they finally feel capable. They are no longer spectators in their own education; they are participants.
When we offer a student the same grade-level content through three different levels of complexity, how does that shift the classroom dynamic from one of "frustration and avoidance" to one of "shared discovery"?
Comments